 |
| JNI Corp. 52-week stock performance |
Sun Microsystems Inc. supplier JNI Corp.'s
recent earnings warning has led to speculation in several quarters
that Sun might follow suit with an earnings warning of its own
prior to the company's formal announcement of its third quarter
results scheduled for Thursday, April 19.
Earlier this week, Goldman Sachs analyst
Laura Conigliaro publicly suggested that Sun {SUNW}
could be among the companies issuing earnings warnings over
the next few days. The analyst cited the "ugly" situation
for enterprise systems companies, which she said could lead
to additional downside risk to Sun's shares of 10 to 30 percent.
Conigliaro's warning came on the heels
of a report published one week earlier from Silicon Valley-based
Zona Research that said JNI's {JNIC}
recent warning was an ominous sign for Sun shareholders.
"We view JNI's warning of revenue
shortfalls as a bellwether of coming events at Sun, as JNI,
which makes adapters for Sun's storage networks, attributed
its own shortfall to weakness in Sun's server market,"
the Zona report concluded.
Late last month, JNI said it expects
fiscal first quarter revenues to rise 9 to 12 percent to $20
to $21 million from the $18.5 million the company posted a year
earlier, with net income, excluding amortization, of 3 cents
to 4 cents a share, compared with 8 cents for the same period
one year earlier. JNI's more optimistic January forecast had
indicated that first half revenues could rise 40 percent to
50 percent year over year, with earnings for the full fiscal
2001 year coming in somewhere between 80 cents to 85 cents a
share.
"With the majority of our revenues
derived from sales of Sun Solaris-based products, continued
weakness in the Sun server marketplace has had an impact on
first quarter performance," said Neal Waddington, JNI's
president and chief executive officer, in a statement that accompanied
the lowered guidance.
A Sun spokesperson refused to comment
on the rumors of an imminent earnings warning, but also indicated
there would be no additional announcements from the company
prior to its official earnings report.
"Our corporate policy is not to
confirm or deny rumors, so I can't help you out with that question,"
wrote Sun spokesperson Elizabeth McNichols in an email response
to CNBC.com. "We are currently in our quiet period before
the earnings announcement on April 19, so we cannot provide
any further comments on outlook until that time," she added.
 |
| Sun Microsystems 52-week stock performance |
Conigliaro, of Goldman Sachs, did not
return CNBC.com's call seeking an interview. Sun's last public
comment on earnings came in late February, when the company
shaved sequential revenue expectations by 12 to 14 percent from
the prior quarter and projected earnings per share in the seven
to nine cent range. Sun posted earnings of 16 cents a share
for its second quarter ended December 31, 2000.
Speculation about Sun missing its numbers
is another indication of the significant slowdown that has hit
many leading Silicon Valley tech firms. Prior to the recent
disappointment Sun had met or beat analyst consensus expectations
for 27 out of the last 28 quarters, according to Toni Sacconaghi,
an analyst at Sanford C. Bernstein & Company, based in New
York.
"I think a warning from Sun is pretty
unlikely," says Sacconaghi. "There really isn't any
history of warnings from the company. So I think if the news
is sad, it's going to come out in the [earnings] call."
Sacconaghi currently has a "market
perform" rating on the stock, adding that Sun, which still
leads the high-end server market with approximately 40 percent
market share, has become a victim of its own success. (Other
players in or seeking to enter Sun's market include Hewlett
Packard Company {HWP},
International Business Machines Corp. {IBM},
Compaq Computer Corp. {CPQ},
Silicon Graphics Inc. {SGI},
and Dell Computer Corp. {DELL})
"Sun benefited enormously last year,
but it set up some pretty difficult year-over-year comparisons,"
says Sacconaghi. "It's unclear to me that the stock has
bottomed and neither the earnings nor the forward guidance will
be particularly encouraging. We need to get a sense that the
worst is fully visible, and we're not there yet."
S.G. Cowen analyst Richard Chu, based
in Boston, agrees.
"Our guess is that business conditions
are proving to be even more challenging than thought just a
month ago," Chu wrote in a research note published last
week. "We think there is more downside to our near-term
profit and loss assumptions for the fourth quarter and even
to our below consensus assumptions for fiscal 2002, and certainly
the first half [of 2002]. We see risk to both top line revenue
and gross margins."
Sun's current difficulties stem primarily
from weakness in the overall economy as well as its role as
the leading supplier of UNIX servers, which are often used as
the hub of internal corporate networks and Internet web sites.
Dying dot coms and a general retrenchment in information technology
spending has pulled the slats out from under the company's growth
story.
"It could be as much as 10 percent
of their market is just gone," says Joe Butt, an analyst
at Forrester Research, based in Cambridge, Massachusetts. "My
guess is that Sun will continue to remain as number one in the
UNIX server market, at least for a while, but how the company
does now depends a lot on what happens to e-business."
Butt says that despite adverse macro-economic
conditions over the short-term, he remains bullish on the company's
long-term future, particularly in the high-end server market
where individual machines containing up to 64 microprocessors
working in parallel can retail for upwards of $1 million dollars
each.
"They're getting more competition
on the low end these days, particularly from Dell," he
says. "But there are more barriers to entry on the high
end. You have to build the machines and then prove they can
run in a reliable manner. That's not something those running
big data centers like to take a chance on. Which is why you
see Sun servers in so many of those environments. I can't say
how the stock market will react. But I do think Sun will continue
to do fine in the real market, particularly on the high end."
Sacconaghi, at Sanford C. Bernstein &
Company, also thinks Sun's fairly safe in the high-end of the
server market, which he says should grow at about 8 to 10 percent
over the next five years, assuming the economy doesn't fall
into a recession.
"We think Sun continues to gain
share in that market," he says, adding that once the current
malaise subsides there is no reason the company should not be
able to grow revenues by about 15 percent a year and increase
earnings by about 20 percent a year.
"But if information technology spending
continues to be weak it's going to affect everything,"
he warns.
|